5 Ways to Avoid Double Taxation in M&A Deals

Double taxation in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) can significantly reduce your earnings. Here's how to avoid it:

1. Tax-Free Reorganization: Use IRS Section 368 to defer taxes by structuring deals as stock-for-stock mergers.
2. Section 338(h)(10) Election: Treat stock sales as asset sales for tax purposes, benefiting both buyers and sellers.
3. Cross-Border Tax Treaties: Leverage treaties to reduce withholding taxes and avoid double taxation in international deals.
4. Contingent Payment Arrangements: Use earnouts to defer taxes by aligning payments with future performance.
5. Hybrid Debt Instruments: Combine debt and equity benefits to reduce taxes while maintaining financial flexibility.

Quick Comparison:

Start tax planning early to maximize benefits and avoid surprises. Double taxation can cost millions, especially with the average M&A deal size reaching $181M in 2024. Consult tax professionals to tailor strategies for your specific deal.

1. Use Tax-Free Reorganization Structures

When it comes to avoiding double taxation in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), tax-free reorganizations under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code offer a smart approach. These structures let companies acquire or transfer assets without triggering immediate income taxes, effectively deferring tax obligations.

The trick? A significant portion of the purchase price - typically between 40% and 100% - must be paid in the buyer’s stock. This ensures that the shareholders of the target company retain a meaningful ownership stake in the new entity, meeting the IRS's continuity requirements.

Four Key Conditions for Tax-Free Reorganizations

For a transaction to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368, four essential conditions must be met:

• Continuity of ownership interest: At least 40%-50% of the purchase price must consist of the acquirer's stock.
• Continuity of business enterprise: The acquiring company must either continue the target’s business operations or use a substantial portion of its assets in an existing business for at least two years.
• Valid business purpose: The transaction must serve legitimate business goals beyond just avoiding taxes.
• Step-transaction doctrine compliance: The IRS must not view the transaction as a series of steps designed to disguise a taxable acquisition.

These requirements form the basis for determining the most suitable reorganization structure for a specific deal.

Types of Reorganization Structures

There are several types of tax-free reorganizations, each with its own rules and advantages:

• Type A reorganizations: These include statutory and triangular mergers. They allow for a mix of consideration, such as cash, debt, or preferred stock, alongside the required acquirer stock.
• Type B reorganizations: In these cases, 100% of the consideration must be voting stock, and the acquirer must gain at least 80% control of the target immediately after the deal closes.
• Type C reorganizations: Here, at least 80% of the total consideration must consist of voting stock.

Choosing the Right Structure for Specific Scenarios

Different situations call for different reorganization types. For instance, reverse triangular mergers are particularly useful when the target company has contracts, licenses, or regulatory approvals that would otherwise be voided or require consent in a standard merger. By keeping the target company as the surviving entity, these assets and agreements remain intact while achieving the desired ownership changes.

"The main use and advantage of a tax-free reorganization is to acquire or dispose of the assets of a business without generating the income tax consequences that would result in a straight sale or purchase of those assets." – Albert Ellentuck, of counsel, King & Nordlinger LLP

Documentation and Compliance: Getting It Right

Recent regulations have tightened the requirements for tax-free reorganizations, demanding detailed documentation. Companies must create a thorough reorganization plan that includes:

• A list of all parties involved
• Steps in the transaction
• Assumptions of liabilities
• The intended tax treatment

This plan must be formally adopted and recorded in corporate documents before the first step of the transaction. Each step must align with the overall business purpose and demonstrate consistency with the reorganization's intent. Failure to comply with these requirements could lead to IRS scrutiny and challenges to the transaction's tax-free status.

It’s also important for target shareholders to understand that receiving "boot" - anything other than the acquiring company’s stock, such as cash - could result in immediate taxable gains on that portion. The stock portion, however, remains tax-deferred, making careful structuring essential.

Navigating tax-free reorganizations requires meticulous planning and execution. Given the complexity of these transactions and their documentation demands, working with experienced professionals is crucial to ensure everything stays on track.

2. Apply Section 338(h)(10) Elections

A Section 338(h)(10) election can be a practical way to address the common buyer-seller conflict in mergers and acquisitions (M&A). This election helps align both parties' interests, offering a tax-efficient solution that benefits each side.

"In simple terms, a 338(h) is a tax election for a qualified stock purchase (QSP), which recharacterizes a stock purchase as an asset purchase for federal tax purposes. It remains a stock purchase for all other legal purposes, such as contracts and licensing." – RKL LLP

How the Election Works

Here's why this election is so effective: it essentially splits the transaction into two perspectives. From a legal standpoint, it remains a stock sale, which means contracts, licenses, and regulatory approvals stay intact. But for federal tax purposes, the IRS treats it as an asset sale. This means the target company is considered to have sold all its assets and then liquidated, while the stock sale itself is ignored for tax calculations. This setup helps avoid the double taxation that usually occurs when both the corporation and its shareholders are taxed.

Benefits for Both Parties

The election creates a win-win scenario. Buyers get a stepped-up basis in the acquired assets, which allows them to depreciate the assets based on their fair market value instead of the original cost. This includes amortizing goodwill over 15 years, which can lead to substantial tax savings. Sellers, on the other hand, avoid the double taxation typically associated with an asset sale because the transaction retains the legal form of a stock sale - even though they may face a higher tax bill on the asset sale gain.

Qualification Requirements and Limitations

To use a Section 338(h)(10) election, certain conditions must be met. The target company must either be a U.S. corporate subsidiary of a parent company or an S-Corporation. Additionally, the buyer needs to acquire at least 80% of the target's stock. Both the buyer and seller must agree to the election - it can't be forced by one side. The election is filed using Form 8023 and must be submitted by the fifteenth day of the ninth month after the buyer gains 80% control. Timing and meticulous planning are key to making this work.

Strategic Considerations and Pricing

This election can be especially beneficial when the transaction involves significant goodwill. For sellers, the goodwill is taxed at rates similar to a stock sale. For buyers, the ability to amortize that goodwill over 15 years provides valuable tax benefits compared to sticking with the historical stock basis. To fully understand the financial impact, savvy buyers often run detailed tax models to compare scenarios with and without the election.

For example, let’s say Alpha Corporation offers $600,000 for all outstanding stock of a company with an inside asset basis of $200,000 and liabilities of $150,000. With a Section 338(h)(10) election, the adjusted deemed sale price becomes $750,000. The seller’s taxable gain is $550,000, which can be offset with available net operating losses, leaving after-tax proceeds of about $582,500.

Given the complexities involved, both buyers and sellers should work closely with experienced tax advisors to ensure compliance and structure the deal to their advantage. This approach not only simplifies tax planning but also sets the stage for exploring other strategies to minimize double taxation in M&A transactions.

3. Use Cross-Border Tax Treaty Benefits

When navigating cross-border M&A deals, tax treaties can be a game-changer in avoiding double taxation. These agreements, established between two countries, ensure the same income isn’t taxed twice and help reduce withholding taxes on international transactions. They fit seamlessly into broader tax-planning strategies for mergers and acquisitions.

The United States has tax treaties with over 60 countries, and globally, there are more than 3,000 such agreements in place. Each treaty has unique provisions that can significantly influence the costs and tax obligations tied to your M&A deal.

How Treaties Help Lower Tax Costs in M&A

Tax treaties allocate taxing rights between countries and offer reduced withholding rates on dividends, interest, and royalties. This creates opportunities to structure financing and payment flows in ways that take advantage of these lower rates.

Take this example: A Germany-based multinational used its Luxembourg subsidiary to finance a U.S. acquisition. Thanks to the Luxembourg-U.S. treaty, interest and royalties paid to a Luxembourg resident were taxable only in Luxembourg, slashing U.S. withholding taxes and minimizing the risk of dual taxation.

Additionally, many treaties exclude certain cash flows not covered under other provisions, further easing tax burdens.

Documentation and Compliance: What You Need to Know

To claim treaty benefits, you’ll need to meet specific residency requirements and provide proper documentation. Residency is usually determined by factors like domicile, citizenship, place of management, or incorporation. Often, this means obtaining residency certificates from the relevant tax authorities to prove eligibility.

For U.S. transactions, you’ll also need to file IRS Form 8833 alongside your income tax return. This form outlines details such as recipient and payer information, the type and amount of treaty benefit claimed, and your explanation for the treaty position. Filing this form annually is essential if you continue to claim treaty benefits. Staying on top of documentation and compliance ensures your tax strategy remains effective and avoids unnecessary complications.

Key Points for Strategic Planning

Most tax treaties include Limitation on Benefits (LOB) provisions to prevent misuse, such as setting up artificial structures solely to claim treaty advantages. Without a legitimate business purpose, these benefits won’t apply.

Also, keep in mind that tax treaties generally address federal taxes, but state tax treatments may differ. It’s crucial to evaluate both federal and state tax implications when structuring your deal.

Collaborating with international tax experts early in the planning phase is a smart move. These professionals can help identify the most tax-efficient jurisdictions and structures while ensuring compliance with treaty anti-abuse rules. By doing so, you can maximize treaty benefits and minimize tax liabilities while staying within the bounds of legal and regulatory requirements.

4. Set Up Contingent Payment Arrangements

Contingent payment arrangements, like earnouts, are an effective way to defer tax obligations in mergers and acquisitions (M&A). By tying payments to performance metrics, earnouts delay tax recognition until the funds are actually received. This approach improves cash flow and helps reduce immediate tax burdens.

How Tax Deferral Works with Earnouts

Here's how earnouts can defer taxes in practice: Imagine a seller agrees to sell stock for $1,000,000, with a basis of $200,000. At closing, the buyer pays $400,000, with the remaining $600,000 split into three equal payments over three years. The seller’s gross profit is $800,000, resulting in a gross profit ratio of 80%. From the $400,000 paid at closing, $360,000 is taxable, while $40,000 is a recovery of basis and not taxed. Each subsequent $200,000 payment triggers $160,000 in taxable gain and $40,000 in tax-free basis recovery.

This installment method allows the taxable gain to align with the actual cash received, creating a predictable framework for tax planning.

Tax Character Considerations

The tax treatment of earnout payments - whether as capital gains or ordinary income - depends on how the arrangement is structured. For payments to qualify as capital gains, they must reflect the sale of shares, not compensation for services. If a seller remains involved with the business post-closing, the IRS might reclassify earnout payments as employment income unless the arrangement is carefully structured.

This distinction often puts buyers and sellers at odds. Sellers generally prefer capital gains treatment for its lower tax rates, while buyers may favor classifying payments as compensation to benefit from tax deductions. Early, detailed negotiations can help bridge these differences.

Timing and Compliance Factors

The timing of when the earnout amount is determined has significant tax implications. If the total earnout value is ascertainable at the time of closing, it is fully taxable as if received immediately. However, if the amount remains uncertain, the earnout right is treated as a separate asset, deferring taxes until payments are made.

Additionally, any interest included in earnout payments must be accounted for separately. This ensures sellers can plan appropriately and avoid unexpected tax issues.

Given the complexity of IRS rules on contingent payments, working with a professional is critical. Poorly structured earnouts can lead to audits, disputes, or reclassifications that erode the intended tax benefits.

Strategic Implementation

To make contingent payment arrangements work effectively, several factors need to align. Payment schedules should match expected cash flows while optimizing tax outcomes. Performance metrics tied to the earnout should be specific and measurable to avoid disputes that could jeopardize the arrangement.

Proper documentation is equally important. Purchase agreements must clearly separate the payment for shares from any compensation for services, especially if the seller remains involved with the business after the sale.

Engaging experienced tax professionals early in the process is key. Careful planning and clear structuring can help ensure compliance with IRS rules while preserving the tax advantages that make contingent payment arrangements a smart strategy in M&A deals. By addressing these details upfront, you can minimize risks and maximize the benefits of this approach.

sbb-itb-e766981

5. Use Hybrid Debt Instruments

Hybrid debt instruments combine the tax advantages of debt with the flexibility of equity. These tools allow companies to deduct interest payments while maintaining healthy credit ratios, effectively reducing their tax burden during mergers and acquisitions (M&A).

How Hybrid Securities Work in M&A Financing

Hybrid instruments are designed to function as debt for tax purposes while being classified as equity for financial reporting. This dual nature offers a unique advantage in M&A deals. Companies can deduct interest payments on these instruments, which reduces their taxable income. At the same time, rating agencies often treat hybrids as a 50/50 mix of debt and equity, which helps maintain favorable leverage metrics.

"The hybrid serves several purposes that interconnect to create a fulsome market, but a common thread is the ability for companies to use a tax-deductible product to lower their cost of funding without risking leverage metrics." - Mizuho Insights

The popularity of hybrid instruments has grown significantly. For example, the corporate hybrid bond market expanded from €20 billion in 2013 to €190 billion in 2021 [1]. This growth highlights their increasing importance, especially in sectors like utilities and telecommunications, where large-scale capital investments are common.

Tax Advantages and Regulatory Considerations

One of the key benefits of hybrid instruments is the tax treatment. Interest payments are deductible, and principal repayments are generally non-taxable. However, the IRS has shown increased scrutiny of these instruments. Since regulations clarifying the distinction between debt and equity remain incomplete, courts have stepped in to provide classification guidelines. As a result, careful structuring is essential to secure the desired tax benefits.

Structuring Hybrids to Avoid Classification Issues

To achieve the intended tax and financial benefits, hybrid instruments must be carefully designed. Key features include:

• Payment flexibility: Allowing issuers to defer payments under specific conditions.
• Longer maturities: Ensuring the instrument aligns with equity-like characteristics.
• Appropriate subordination: Essential for achieving the 50/50 debt-equity classification.

Clear documentation is also critical. For example, repayment schedules tied to future events can support the instrument's classification as debt. Additionally, companies should monitor their overall debt-to-equity ratios to avoid thin capitalization risks, which could draw regulatory attention.

Strategic Use in M&A Financing

Hybrid instruments are particularly useful in M&A deals, as they allow acquirers to finance transactions without significantly affecting their credit profiles. The 50% equity treatment means that for every $1 of hybrid debt issued, leverage ratios are nearly halved compared to traditional debt financing. This has become even more appealing as subordination premiums have dropped - from a historical average of 250 basis points to 164 basis points in 2024 [2].

Industries like utilities and telecommunications have embraced hybrids due to their massive infrastructure and energy project needs. These instruments provide a tax-efficient way to raise capital while maintaining financial flexibility, complementing other financing strategies.

Given the complexities involved, working with experienced tax and legal advisors is essential. Firms like Phoenix Strategy Group can help companies structure hybrid instruments effectively, ensuring maximum tax benefits and optimal financial outcomes. Early planning with experts is crucial to navigating the intricate requirements of hybrid financing in M&A transactions.

Strategy Comparison Table

The table below summarizes the strategies discussed, focusing on their tax-saving potential, compliance challenges, and best use cases.

When selecting a strategy, it’s essential to weigh tax efficiency against regulatory complexity. For cross-border transactions, extra attention is needed to address transfer pricing requirements and streamline legal entities to reduce ongoing tax exposure. Additionally, indirect taxes like stamp duties and VAT - typically irrelevant in domestic deals - can become significant factors in international transactions.

For larger international acquisitions, combining strategies can often yield better results. For example, leveraging tax treaties to lower withholding taxes while using hybrid debt structures can provide ongoing interest deductions, maximizing overall savings.

As deal complexity grows, working with seasoned advisors becomes indispensable. Phoenix Strategy Group specializes in guiding companies through these intricate tax planning decisions, helping to tailor transaction structures to fit specific needs and long-term goals.

Conclusion

Avoiding double taxation in M&A deals isn't just about compliance - it’s about smart, strategic planning right from the start. The five approaches discussed - tax-free reorganizations, Section 338(h)(10) elections, cross-border tax treaty benefits, contingent payment arrangements, and hybrid debt instruments - can help tailor your deal for better tax outcomes, depending on the specifics of your transaction.

With taxes impacting 30%–40% of deal finances and the average 2024 deal size hitting $181 million, even small tax savings can translate into millions. But here’s the catch: modern tax regulations are complex, and relying solely on internal teams may lead to missed opportunities or costly mistakes. That’s why engaging tax professionals early in the process is essential. The best outcomes often come from planning that begins years in advance, giving companies the time to adjust structures and prepare for a tax-efficient transaction.

For businesses navigating these challenges, partnering with advisors who truly understand both the M&A process and tax intricacies can make all the difference. Phoenix Strategy Group brings together M&A expertise and advanced tax planning to help growth-stage companies minimize tax burdens while achieving their broader goals. Their approach ensures tax strategies are woven into every stage of the deal, maximizing value and reducing risk.

Think of tax planning not as an afterthought but as a strategic tool. By prioritizing effective tax structuring, you can avoid double taxation and unlock greater value in every transaction.

FAQs

What are the main advantages and drawbacks of using a Section 338(h)(10) election in M&A transactions?

A Section 338(h)(10) election can be a powerful tool in mergers and acquisitions, offering some notable benefits while also presenting a few challenges.

On the plus side, this election allows for a stepped-up tax basis in the target company's assets. What does that mean? The buyer gets to claim higher depreciation and amortization deductions, which can lower taxable income in the future. Another advantage is that the target company keeps its legal entity intact, which can be critical for preserving contracts, licenses, or agreements that aren't easily transferable. Plus, this election strikes a balance: it treats the deal as an asset sale for tax purposes but keeps it structured as a stock sale legally - something that can make both parties happy.

But there are trade-offs. The election can trigger tax liabilities like depreciation recapture and sales taxes, which might eat into the financial upside. Sellers, in particular, could face a bigger tax bill because of the asset sale treatment, often leading to tough price renegotiations. On top of that, since the deal is technically a stock sale, the buyer might inherit some of the target company's liabilities, which could become a problem depending on the company’s financial or legal situation.

How can international tax treaties help reduce double taxation in cross-border M&A deals?

International tax treaties are crucial in reducing the risk of double taxation in cross-border M&A transactions. These agreements often lower withholding tax rates on payments such as dividends, interest, and royalties, which can significantly ease the tax burden. They also offer tools like tax credits, deductions, or exemptions to prevent the same income from being taxed in more than one country.

To take full advantage of these treaties, it’s important to thoroughly review their provisions, especially Limitation on Benefits (LOB) clauses, to ensure compliance and eligibility. By understanding and strategically planning around these terms, both acquiring and target companies can better manage their tax obligations while adhering to regulatory standards.

What should be considered when structuring hybrid debt instruments to maximize tax benefits in M&A deals?

When dealing with hybrid debt instruments in mergers and acquisitions, understanding their classification as debt or equity for tax purposes is a critical step. This classification directly influences how interest payments are handled - specifically, whether they qualify as tax-deductible. This can have a major impact on the transaction's overall tax strategy.

The terms of the instrument also play a key role. Factors like the balance between debt and equity, as well as any rights or obligations tied to the instrument, should be structured to support the financial objectives of the deal. These terms can significantly affect both interest deductibility and tax liabilities under U.S. tax regulations.

Working closely with seasoned tax advisors is essential. Their expertise ensures compliance with tax laws and helps achieve the most favorable tax outcomes for all parties involved in the transaction.

Related posts

• Tax Challenges in Cross-Border M&A
• Tax Structuring in Cross-Border M&A: Key Strategies
• Stock-for-Stock Mergers: Tax-Free or Not?
• Cross-Border Taxation: Equity Awards in M&A Deals