5 CAC Calculation Errors to Avoid

Calculating Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) is more complicated than it seems. Many SaaS companies miscalculate this key metric, leading to poor budgeting, flawed growth strategies, and unreliable financial reports. Avoid these five common mistakes to ensure your CAC reflects the true cost of acquiring new customers:

• Leaving Out Indirect and Overhead Costs: Exclude salaries, rent, and software tools, and your CAC will underestimate real expenses.
• Confusing CAC with Cost Per Lead (CPL): CPL only covers lead generation, while CAC factors in the entire journey to convert leads into paying customers.
• Ignoring Time Lag: Misaligning marketing spend with customer conversion timelines skews CAC calculations, especially in industries with long sales cycles.
• Mixing Costs for New vs. Existing Customers: Retention efforts and upselling costs don’t belong in CAC calculations focused on new customer acquisition.
• Excluding One-Time Costs: Major campaigns, product launches, and rebranding efforts can significantly impact CAC if not properly accounted for.

Mistakes like these can distort your customer profitability metrics and mislead your decision-making. Properly tracking all relevant costs, segmenting by customer type, and aligning calculations with sales cycles will give you a clearer, more actionable CAC.

The Ultimate Guide to Calculating CAC for SaaS and B2B Companies

1. Excluding Indirect and Overhead Costs

A common pitfall when calculating Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) is oversimplifying the math - just dividing ad spend by the number of new customers. While this might seem straightforward, it skips over indirect and overhead expenses that can heavily influence the real cost of acquiring a customer.

Indirect costs include things like employee salaries for those involved in customer acquisition, even if they only dedicate part of their time to it. For instance, if an employee earning $90,000 spends 40% of their time on acquisition efforts, $36,000 of their salary should be factored into CAC. Similarly, a sales director with a $120,000 salary who focuses 60% of their time on acquiring new customers contributes $72,000 annually to this metric. When you add up multiple employees like this, the numbers start to climb quickly.

Overhead costs are just as critical. If marketing and sales teams occupy 30% of your office space, then 30% of your rent, utilities, and facilities costs - like internet access and equipment - should be included in CAC. And don’t forget the tools your team relies on, such as CRMs, email platforms, and analytics software. These subscriptions can add thousands of dollars to your monthly expenses.

Failing to account for these indirect and overhead costs results in an "unloaded" CAC - a number that might look good on paper but doesn’t reflect reality. For example, while your direct ad spend might suggest a CAC of $2,000, adding in salaries, office costs, and software could reveal a far higher figure, closer to $3,500.

To get a more accurate CAC, you need a systematic approach. Start by listing all employees involved in customer acquisition and calculate the portion of their salaries tied to these activities. Then, document software subscriptions and allocate costs based on usage. Finally, determine the share of your physical and operational resources - like office space - that supports customer acquisition, and assign those overhead costs accordingly. Using a detailed spreadsheet or accounting software to track these expenses will help ensure consistency over time.

At Phoenix Strategy Group, we stress the importance of capturing every relevant expense to reveal the true cost of customer acquisition. A fully loaded CAC allows you to set realistic budgets, refine your growth strategies, and present trustworthy metrics to stakeholders. It’s not just about getting the numbers right - it’s about making smarter decisions for the future.

2. Confusing CAC with Cost Per Lead (CPL)

Mixing up Cost Per Lead (CPL) with Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) is a common mistake that can throw off your financial planning. CPL focuses solely on the cost of generating a lead - essentially, the first point of contact or interest. On the other hand, CAC includes the entire cost of turning that lead into a paying customer. This means factoring in all the follow-up, sales efforts, and conversion activities that come after the lead is generated^[1].

This confusion can lead to underestimating your actual acquisition costs. For instance, imagine you calculate a CPL of $500, but after factoring in additional sales and conversion expenses, your CAC balloons to $2,000. That’s a 75% difference you might overlook^[1]. Such miscalculations can lead to poor budgeting, wasted marketing dollars, inaccurate profit forecasts, and even premature scaling. You might boost your marketing spend based on a favorable CPL, only to later realize that the true CAC makes the whole effort unprofitable^[7].

The gap between CPL and CAC is even wider for B2B companies with longer sales cycles. A $500 CPL in a B2B context could result in a CAC of $3,000 to $5,000 due to the extended time and resources needed to close deals. In contrast, B2C companies with shorter sales cycles often see a smaller difference between these metrics since their lead-to-customer process is more streamlined. Recognizing these distinctions is essential for fine-tuning your budgeting and scaling efforts.

To better understand the relationship between CPL and CAC, consider this formula:
CAC = CPL ÷ Conversion Rate
Even a low CPL can lead to a high CAC if your conversion rate is poor. For example, with a CPL of $10 and a 5% conversion rate, your CAC would be $200. However, doubling the conversion rate to 10% would cut your CAC in half to $100. This simple example shows how improving conversion rates can significantly optimize your costs^[3].

To avoid mixing up these metrics, establish clear definitions and track them separately in your financial systems. Create distinct cost categories: one for lead generation (CPL) and another for lead conversion (CAC). CPL should include direct costs like ad spend on platforms such as Google Ads or Facebook, content creation, and email marketing. Meanwhile, CAC must account for broader expenses, such as sales team salaries, CRM subscriptions, sales management overhead, and customer support during onboarding^[3][7][2].

Here’s a practical example: You spend $300 on a Facebook ad campaign that generates 100 leads, giving you a CPL of $3. But when you factor in a sales rep’s $50,000 annual salary, $100 monthly CRM fees, and the time spent nurturing and closing those leads, your CAC could range from $15 to $25 per customer^[2].

When sharing these metrics with stakeholders or investors, transparency is key. Clearly define what each metric includes and present them separately. For example:
"Our CPL is $50, but our fully loaded CAC, which includes sales salaries, CRM fees, and support costs, is $200."
This level of clarity not only builds trust but also ensures everyone has a complete understanding of your financial picture^[6].

3. Ignoring Time Lag and Customer Acquisition Journey Length

When calculating Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC), one of the biggest mistakes businesses make is overlooking the time gap between marketing spend and when customers actually convert. This is especially common in industries like B2B SaaS, where the customer acquisition journey can stretch across several months^[1]. Matching your January marketing expenses with January conversions creates a misleading picture that can skew your understanding of acquisition costs.

Let’s break it down: imagine you invest $10,000 in marketing during January, but those efforts don’t result in conversions until March or April. If you attribute those January expenses to January’s customer acquisitions, you’ll end up overstating January’s CAC while understating it for later months^[1]. This misalignment prevents you from accurately identifying which marketing efforts are effective, making it harder to allocate your budget wisely.

Another issue arises when you compare CAC across months with uneven marketing spend. For example, February’s CAC might seem low because it’s benefiting from January’s marketing investment, while January’s CAC looks inflated even though its campaigns are still driving results^[3]. To fix this, align your CAC calculations with your average sales cycle. For instance, if your sales cycle is 90 days, use a 90-day window to match expenses with conversions^[1]. For companies with longer sales cycles, quarterly or even semi-annual calculations may be more accurate.

Take a typical B2B SaaS customer journey: a prospect might engage with your content in January, have a sales call in February, and finally sign a contract in April. If you only measure January’s marketing spend against January’s new customers, you’re missing the full picture. Instead, align your calculations to the actual timeline of customer conversions.

Segmented CAC calculations can also provide deeper insights^[1]. Different customer segments or marketing channels often have varying sales cycle lengths. For instance, you might calculate CAC monthly for self-serve customers with a two-week sales cycle, but quarterly for enterprise customers with a six-month cycle. This approach prevents a misleading overall CAC from masking critical details about your business^[4].

Attribution models add another layer of complexity. For instance, if a customer sees a Facebook ad in January, visits your blog in February, and signs up via email in March, how do you assign the acquisition cost? A last-click attribution model would credit the email channel and March timeframe, potentially misrepresenting the true cost and timeline of acquisition^[3]. Multi-touch attribution distributes the cost across channels, providing a more comprehensive view of each channel’s role and the overall customer journey^[3].

Failing to account for time lag can have serious consequences. If your CAC appears artificially low, you might assume you need less budget than you actually do, potentially causing your marketing and sales teams to miss their targets^[6]. On the flip side, if your CAC seems artificially high, you might cut budgets prematurely, just as campaigns are starting to show results.

To address this, start by auditing your sales cycle. Analyze customer data to determine the average time from initial contact to conversion^[1]. Document this for your overall business, as well as by customer segment or channel. Then, align your CAC measurement period with your sales cycle length. For example, if your average cycle is 60 days, use 60-day windows instead of monthly calculations^[3]. Many businesses find that monthly or quarterly CAC calculations work best for operational analysis^[4].

Cohort analysis is another powerful tool. Group all prospects who first engaged with your marketing in January into a cohort, then track how many converted in January, February, March, and beyond^[3]. By examining multiple cohorts over time, you can calculate your average sales cycle length and see how conversions are distributed across time periods. If 60% of conversions happen within 30 days but 40% take 60+ days, you’ll know that monthly CAC calculations alone won’t provide an accurate picture.

Research shows that nearly 70% of SaaS businesses either underestimate or miscalculate their user acquisition costs, with poor alignment of time periods being a key factor^[5]. By accounting for time lag and aligning your CAC calculations with your actual sales cycle, you’ll gain a clearer understanding of your acquisition costs and make better decisions for your business.

sbb-itb-e766981

4. Including Existing Customers and Not Segmenting by Customer Type

Mixing the costs of acquiring new customers with the expenses of retaining existing ones can distort your Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) calculations, leading to poor decisions about where to allocate marketing and sales budgets. CAC should focus exclusively on the costs of turning prospects into paying customers - not on the ongoing expenses tied to retaining or growing current accounts^[7].

Take this example: if a customer success manager is responsible for nurturing existing clients and encouraging subscription upgrades, their salary shouldn’t be part of your CAC. They’re focused on increasing revenue from current customers, not acquiring new ones^[7]. The same goes for retention marketing, customer support teams handling ongoing inquiries, and account management activities aimed at renewals or upselling.

For roles that split time between acquiring new customers and supporting existing ones - like a VP of Sales who spends 60% of their time on new business and 40% on current accounts - you need to allocate their salary proportionally^[7]. Without this distinction, it’s nearly impossible to evaluate whether your acquisition strategy is efficient or if you’re overspending to bring in new customers. Combining these costs also masks the performance differences among customer segments.

Another frequent mistake is calculating a single, blended CAC across all customer types. This approach hides the nuances of acquisition efficiency and profitability^[1]. For instance, acquiring an enterprise customer might take a six-month sales cycle and dedicated account executives, resulting in a $50,000 CAC. Meanwhile, a small business customer acquired through self-serve channels might cost just $500. Averaging these costs into a single $10,000 CAC figure obscures the real story and can mislead decision-making.

Segmenting customers is crucial because different groups require tailored acquisition strategies. Separating costs by segment - whether by enterprise, mid-market, SMB, geography, or product line - can pinpoint where your resources are working best^[1]. It also helps you understand the relationship between CAC and customer lifetime value (LTV). For example, a CAC of $50 might seem great or concerning depending on whether the LTV is $500 or $5,000. A healthy LTV:CAC ratio is generally around 3:1 or higher, but blending CAC across segments can make this ratio meaningless. A 2.5:1 overall ratio might raise red flags, but segmenting could reveal that enterprise customers are at 5:1 while SMB customers are closer to 1.5:1 - offering clear opportunities for adjustment.

To fix these issues, start by auditing all expenses in your CAC calculation^[7]. Create a detailed list that includes salaries, tools, overhead, advertising, commissions, and more. For each item, ask: Is this cost directly related to acquiring new customers, or does it support existing ones? Exclude costs like customer success salaries (unless they’re tied to onboarding), customer support, retention marketing, and account management. Instead, include expenses such as salaries for sales teams focused on new acquisitions, marketing spend, CRM software, sales tools, and the portion of managerial salaries tied to new customer efforts.

Segment your customers by^[1][3]:

• Defining the segments most relevant to your business, such as company size, acquisition channel, product line, or geography.
• Allocating acquisition costs to the right segment. For instance, if your VP of Sales spends 60% of their time on enterprise deals and 40% on SMBs, split their salary accordingly.
• Counting only the new customers acquired in each segment during a set period.
• Calculating segment-specific CAC using the formula: CAC = Total Acquisition Costs for the Segment / Number of New Customers in that Segment.

When dealing with shared costs, use clear allocation drivers. For example, CRM data can help allocate sales salaries based on time spent per segment, while marketing tool costs might be divided according to usage or campaign targeting. Document your allocation methods consistently to ensure your segment-specific CAC trends remain accurate over time.

Accurate CAC calculations are essential - not just for internal decision-making but also for providing transparent metrics to investors and benchmarking against industry standards^[6]. Misstated CAC figures, whether too high or too low, can lead to misaligned budgets and ultimately hinder growth. Beyond proper segmentation and cost allocation, don’t forget to account for one-time or unusual expenses that might temporarily skew your CAC metrics.

5. Overlooking One-Time and Non-Standard Costs

When calculating Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC), it’s easy to miss one-time or non-standard expenses. These costs - like major product launches, rebranding efforts, or large-scale industry events - often fall outside regular budgets and are treated as nonrecurring. However, leaving them out of your CAC calculations can lead to skewed results.

Take this example: If you exclude a $50,000 rebranding campaign that brought in 200 new customers, you’d underestimate your CAC by $250 per customer^[6]. This kind of oversight can throw off your budget planning and make it harder to compare performance across different periods.

Another challenge is how these one-time costs can distort comparisons. A quarter with a significant one-time marketing investment might look wildly different from a quieter quarter, making it hard to draw meaningful conclusions. Think of it as comparing apples to oranges.

To address this, it’s crucial to separate recurring costs from one-time expenses - and include both in your calculations. Recurring costs, like salaries, software subscriptions, rent, and ongoing advertising, are predictable and happen regularly. On the other hand, one-time costs - such as product launches, rebranding campaigns, conference sponsorships, or special promotions - should be clearly identified and attributed to the period they occur. For example, you might report: “Q2 CAC was $350, including a $75,000 rebranding campaign. Excluding that cost, normalized CAC was approximately $280.” This approach gives stakeholders a clear view of both the actual and adjusted figures.

To stay organized, maintain a dedicated log for these one-time expenses. Track details like the cost category, amount, date, related customer acquisitions, and the business justification. Many companies find quarterly reviews helpful, where finance and marketing teams collaborate to ensure no one-time costs slip through the cracks.

When deciding what to include, ask yourself: Did this expense directly contribute to acquiring new customers? For instance, spending $30,000 on a booth at an industry conference designed to generate leads should be fully counted. In contrast, a $30,000 office furniture upgrade might only include the portion allocated to marketing and sales. Examples of costs to include are major product launches, rebranding efforts, large industry events, special promotions, one-time technology rollouts, and acquisition-related bonuses. Exclude unrelated expenses like office relocations, non-marketing equipment replacements, or legal settlements.

Being transparent about both actual and normalized CAC builds trust with stakeholders, especially when raising capital or benchmarking against competitors. Investors want the full picture of what it costs to acquire customers, and providing both figures ensures clarity and avoids misleading conclusions. Including one-time expenses in your calculations paints a more accurate picture of your acquisition costs, which is critical for long-term strategic planning.

For more tips on refining your CAC calculations, check out resources from Phoenix Strategy Group (https://phoenixstrategy.group).

Conclusion

Getting your Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) calculations right is crucial for making smart financial decisions. By avoiding the common pitfalls we’ve discussed, you’ll gain a better understanding of what it truly costs to bring in new customers. This clarity directly impacts how you allocate marketing budgets, forecast revenue, and plan for growth.

When your CAC calculations miss the mark, it can lead to missteps - like underfunding channels that are performing well, overinvesting in inefficient ones, or presenting unreliable metrics to investors.

Accurate CAC tracking doesn’t happen by accident - it requires a structured approach. You need to track all expenses systematically, from direct marketing costs and sales salaries to overhead and software tools. It's also important to differentiate between recurring and one-time costs, segment by customer type and acquisition channel, and ensure consistency in time periods. Calculating both standard CAC and fully loaded CAC gives you a more complete financial picture.

For many growing companies, building these processes internally can be tough. Teams are often focused on scaling the business, not fine-tuning financial tracking systems. This is where professional financial advisors can make a real difference. These experts bring skills in expense categorization, cost allocation, and financial modeling - areas that might take years to master in-house. Their expertise ensures precise expense tracking, which becomes especially critical during fundraising or exit planning when investors scrutinize unit economics.

Phoenix Strategy Group (https://phoenixstrategy.group) specializes in helping growth-stage companies establish reliable CAC frameworks through fractional CFO services, FP&A systems, and bookkeeping support. They assist in identifying cost efficiencies, benchmarking against industry standards, and developing KPIs that drive profitable growth. Their insights can uncover redundant tools, inefficient sales processes, or poorly allocated overhead costs that inflate your CAC without delivering value.

To get the most out of your CAC analysis, it’s essential to evaluate it alongside Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) and segment the data by channel and customer type. Transparency about what’s included in the calculations is key. When you master these fundamentals, CAC evolves from just another metric into a powerful strategic tool that shapes decisions on everything from market entry to customer acquisition investments.

If your current CAC calculations rely on overly simple formulas or miss key cost categories, now is the time to step up your approach. Whether you refine your processes in-house or partner with financial advisors, investing in accurate CAC measurements will lead to smarter resource allocation, stronger investor trust, and more sustainable growth. Accurate CAC tracking isn’t just about numbers - it’s about making decisions that set your business up for long-term success.

FAQs

What’s the best way to allocate indirect and overhead costs when calculating CAC?

Accurately assigning indirect and overhead costs is key to calculating your Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC). Start by pinpointing all the indirect expenses tied to customer acquisition. These might include marketing team salaries, software subscriptions, or even office utilities. Once identified, apply a consistent method - like percentage-based allocation - to distribute these costs proportionally to your acquisition activities.

For instance, if part of your team's workload focuses on bringing in new customers, allocate that specific percentage of their salaries to your CAC calculation. Be sure to maintain detailed records and revisit your allocation methods regularly to keep them aligned with your business's growth and changes. This ensures your CAC truly represents the cost of acquiring customers, enabling smarter decisions for your growth strategy.

How can I ensure my CAC calculations account for different sales cycles and time delays?

To ensure your Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) calculations reflect the realities of your sales cycles and time lags, you need to consider the time it takes for leads to become paying customers. One effective way to do this is through cohort analysis. This method groups customers based on when they entered your sales funnel, allowing you to track their conversion journey. It provides insights into how acquisition costs align with revenue over time.

It's also essential to factor in all acquisition-related expenses, even those with delayed impacts, like commissions or long-term marketing campaigns. Adjusting your CAC calculations to match the timing of these costs and the resulting revenue gives you a clearer understanding of how efficiently you're acquiring customers.

Why should you segment Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) by customer type, and how does it influence business decisions?

Segmenting Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) by customer type is an essential practice for businesses aiming to understand which customer groups are the most economical to acquire and keep. Acquisition costs often vary across segments due to differences in marketing methods, sales approaches, or the level of service required.

Breaking down CAC at a more detailed level allows businesses to make smarter resource allocation decisions, fine-tune marketing budgets, and focus on customer groups that offer the most value. This deeper insight can reveal underperforming strategies, help refine campaigns, and ultimately boost profitability.

Related Blog Posts

• LTV:CAC Ratio: How to Calculate and Use It
• 7 SaaS Metrics for Customer Acquisition Funnels
• CAC vs. CLV: Metrics for Scaling Businesses
• CAC Metrics: Pricing Model Benchmarks